So for one of my final blogs I wanted to share an excerpt from my final paper with you all. My initial topic was on the stars but after reading a great deal of the book Dr. Langguth allowed me to borrow my topic veered slightly. Well here ya go.
My
argument lies in this question: How can it be, when we acquire scientific
knowledge that there are aspects of our universe that we do not understand or
could not possibly understand we disregard it? There is scientific knowledge that shows that our human capabilities are
far too inadequate to comprehend certain phenomena’s especially those we are unable to come in any contact with. This is why the stars, the solar systems, the
galaxies and cosmos are so fascinating.
To clarify, it’s not that we intentionally ignore this knowledge, but we
don’t appreciate it or aim to understand it on the merit that it deserves. Why? Because we are creatures of
experience. We can try as hard as we
like to understand the phenomenon and all things around us, even when science
backs it up we cannot fully conceptualize it until it becomes concrete. My favorite example of this is the effects of
global warming. Scientifically, based
upon previous knowledge and understanding, we are able to predict the ramifications
of climate change. We have
scientifically determined that we are at fault for this global occurrence. We have scientifically recognized that if we
do not reverse the effects we have caused terrible global events will
occur. We have scientifically evaluated
how to address and solve the problem. Finally, we have scientifically predicted
that our problem solving tactics and actions will be effective. Yet, not enough is being accomplished on the
issue. We are so contradictory; we are so quick to want to acknowledge that science has all the answers but then we don’t always follow where
it leads us. This is a direct result of lack of
concrete experience. Without that
palpable evidence our learning and understanding is incomplete. Furthermore, in regards to the universe we
are incapable of ever completely understanding it because we will never have
hands on experience with all of it. That
is not necessarily a limitation of science, that is a limitation of human
intellect.
In my paper I really examine the role of humans in the universe, and how the universe may always be entirely to complex for us to fully understand. Our limitations are not a flaw in our scientific process. Rather the limitation is in humanity.
No comments:
Post a Comment